Cohen Admits to Stealing Money from Trump During Trial

The highly anticipated hush money trial of former President Donald Trump has taken a dramatic turn, with his former personal lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen, making a shocking admission on the stand. In a stunning revelation, Cohen has acknowledged that he stole $30,000 from the Trump Organization as he was exiting the company in early 2017.

This development adds a new layer of complexity to the already high-stakes case, where Cohen is serving as the star witness for the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. The prosecution’s case hinges on Cohen’s testimony about the $130,000 hush money payment he made to adult film star Stormy Daniels on Trump’s behalf during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Cohen’s Cross-Examination and Admission of Theft

During the cross-examination by Trump’s defense lawyer, Todd Blanche, Cohen openly acknowledged that he had stolen $30,000 from the Trump Organization as part of his reimbursement for the Stormy Daniels hush money payment. When directly asked by Blanche if he had stolen from his former employer, Cohen replied, “Yes, sir.”

Blanche followed up by asking Cohen if he had paid back the stolen funds, to which Cohen responded, “No, sir.” This revelation has cast further doubt on Cohen’s credibility as the prosecution’s key witness, with the defense team attempting to undermine his trustworthiness and portray him as a disgruntled former employee seeking to settle personal scores.

The Overcharged Expense Reimbursement

According to Cohen’s testimony, the $30,000 he stole from the Trump Organization was part of an exit package he had negotiated to help cover up the hush money payment to Stormy Daniels. Cohen admitted that he had claimed to have paid $50,000 to a technology company called Red Finch, when in reality, he had only paid them $20,000 in cash, pocketing the remaining $30,000 for himself.

Cohen justified this theft by claiming that he was “angry” about having his annual holiday bonus cut, and he viewed the overcharged reimbursement as a way to recoup the lost funds. However, he acknowledged that this was the “wrong thing to do” and that he had not repaid the stolen money to the Trump Organization.

The CNBC Poll and Trump’s Ranking

During the re-direct questioning by a prosecutor, more details emerged about the purpose of the $50,000 payment to Red Finch. Cohen testified that the service provided by the tech company was to boost Trump’s ranking in a CNBC online poll that asked people to name the greatest business leaders in U.S. history.

According to Cohen, Trump was upset because he was polling towards the “very, very bottom” of the list, and Red Finch promised to improve his ranking using an “algorithm” and by purchasing IP addresses that would pass as individual poll participants. Trump ultimately reached the 9th spot in the CNBC poll, but he still refused to pay the full $50,000 fee, leading Cohen to pocket the $30,000 difference.

The Prosecution’s Dilemma

This revelation of Cohen’s theft from the Trump Organization has presented a significant challenge for the prosecution’s case. As the star witness, Cohen’s credibility has been called into question, and the defense team has seized upon this opportunity to further undermine his testimony.

The prosecution’s task of proving the alleged hush money scheme and the falsification of business records has become more complex, as the defense can now argue that Cohen’s own actions in falsifying records and stealing from his former employer call into question the reliability of his account.

The Defense’s Approach

The defense team, led by Todd Blanche, has been relentless in its efforts to discredit Cohen and his testimony. During the cross-examination, Blanche pressed Cohen on whether his ability to make money since he can no longer practice law depends on his public persona as Trump’s former fixer-turned-antagonist.

Blanche suggested that Cohen’s fame and potential book and TV deals are the result of his ongoing attacks on his former boss, implying that Cohen has a vested interest in portraying Trump in a negative light. This line of questioning aims to sow further doubt in the minds of the jurors about Cohen’s motivations and the reliability of his account.

The Implications for the Trump Hush Money Trial

The revelation of Cohen’s theft from the Trump Organization has the potential to significantly impact the outcome of the hush money trial. The defense team is likely to argue that Cohen’s admitted dishonesty and criminal behavior undermine his credibility as the prosecution’s star witness, potentially leading to a hung jury or even an acquittal for Trump.

Moreover, the defense may argue that Cohen’s actions in falsifying records and stealing from the Trump Organization are similar to the very actions that Trump is accused of, further complicating the prosecution’s case. This could make it more challenging for the jury to distinguish between the alleged crimes of Trump and the admitted crimes of Cohen, potentially creating reasonable doubt in their minds.

The Broader Context and Trump’s Legal Troubles

The hush money trial is just one of the many legal battles Donald Trump is facing. The former president has a long history of legal troubles, from bankruptcies and fraud allegations to the ongoing investigations into his business dealings and the events surrounding the January 6th, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

The revelation of Cohen’s theft from the Trump Organization adds another layer of complexity to the former president’s legal challenges, as it could potentially undermine the prosecution’s efforts in this and other cases. Trump’s defenders may seize on this development as further evidence of a “witch hunt” against the former president, while his critics may view it as yet another example of his questionable business practices and the enablers who have surrounded him.

The Potential Impact on Trump’s Political Future

As the hush money trial continues to unfold, the implications for Donald Trump’s political future remain uncertain. The former president has hinted at a possible 2024 presidential run, and the outcome of this trial could have a significant impact on his ability to mount a successful campaign.

If Trump is ultimately acquitted, it could bolster his standing among his core supporters and embolden him to pursue another run for the White House. Conversely, a conviction or a hung jury could deal a significant blow to his political aspirations, potentially opening the door for other Republican contenders to emerge and challenge him for the party’s nomination.

The Ongoing Debate and Public Scrutiny

The hush money trial has captivated the nation, with the public closely following the developments and engaging in heated debates over the implications of Cohen’s theft and the broader legal battle. The case has become a microcosm of the deep political divisions that have characterized the Trump presidency and its aftermath.

As the trial continues, the media and the public will undoubtedly scrutinize every twist and turn, analyzing the potential impact on Trump’s legal and political future. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences, not only for the former president but also for the broader political landscape in the United States.

The Importance of Objective Reporting and Analysis

In the midst of this high-profile trial, it is crucial that the public has access to objective, fact-based reporting and analysis. While the case has the potential to generate sensational headlines and partisan rhetoric, it is essential that journalists and commentators approach the subject with a commitment to impartiality and a focus on the underlying legal and political issues at stake.

Ultimately, the hush money trial and the revelations surrounding Cohen’s theft from the Trump Organization serve as a reminder of the complexities and challenges that come with navigating the intersection of politics, business, and the law. As the case continues to unfold, it will be up to the legal system, the media, and the public to ensure that justice is served and that the truth is upheld, regardless of the political affiliations or personal agendas of those involved.

More Reading

Post navigation

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *