Great news, everyone. John Brennan has officially looked into the matter of John Brennan and decided after a thorough investigation of himself that he did absolutely nothing wrong. Case closed. Let’s all pack it in, go home, and pretend the entire Russia-collusion circus never happened. Brennan’s on MSNBC telling the world, “I just don’t see any case against me.” Well, that settles it, right?
Wrong.
John Brennan says after a thorough review of his own actions, he’s concluded that “I just don’t see any case against me."
Well, that settles it then. pic.twitter.com/9ycyn7i93G
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) September 27, 2025
This is the same John Brennan who helped push the Russia hoax harder than CNN pushed masks. The same Brennan who stood on national TV calling President Trump a “traitor” without evidence. Now, when it looks like the heat might finally reach his corner, he’s suddenly the voice of legal reason and self-exoneration. You’ve got to love the confidence it takes to declare your own innocence on cable news like you’re Judge Judy and the defendant at the same time.
According to reports, Brennan’s been working overtime spinning for his old pal James Comey, because let’s face it, when the music stops, someone’s going to be left without a seat, and Brennan’s name is on the short list. With more evidence continuing to come out from Durham’s investigation and others into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, Brennan has good reason to start sweating through his starched collar.
Here’s the highlight from his interview: “I’ve looked back on all of my actions and decisions… they were certainly consistent with our legal authorities and with the law.” Sure, John. And Bill Clinton didn’t inhale, either.
Let’s be real here. The Obama-era intelligence community, under Brennan’s direction, went full throttle trying to sabotage President Trump’s campaign, then his presidency. They abused FISA courts, relied on the phony Steele Dossier, and played footsie with the media to keep the “collusion” narrative alive, all while knowing the entire thing was a fabrication. Brennan was smack in the middle of it.
But now, because someone revoked a few security clearances, Brennan wants to claim victimhood and act like that somehow undermines the case against him? That’s not how this works. Losing a clearance doesn’t magically erase actions that may have violated legal boundaries. You don’t get to dodge accountability just because you no longer have a badge.
Sorry, John. Just because you say there’s “no case” doesn’t mean you’re in the clear. It just means you’re nervous. And frankly, you should be.
Leave a Comment