The political landscape is abuzz with the news that Kamala Harris has reportedly selected Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate. This decision, according to prominent conservative commentator Ben Shapiro, is a “massive gift to the Republicans” and an act of “political malpractice.” Shapiro, known for his sharp analysis and unwavering stances, has wasted no time in dissecting the implications of Harris’ choice, offering a scathing critique that has sent shockwaves through the political sphere.
Shapiro’s Perspective on Kamala Harris’ VP Pick
Ben Shapiro, the Editor Emeritus of The Daily Wire, has long been an outspoken critic of the Democratic Party and its policies. His response to the news of Kamala Harris’ VP selection is no exception. Shapiro has labeled Walz as a “radical Leftist” with a “long history of insane statements,” arguing that his selection is a boon for the Republican Party.
Shapiro’s primary contention is that Walz’s political leanings are far too extreme for the national stage. He describes the Minnesota governor as a “Bernie Sanders from Minnesota,” alluding to Walz’s progressive policies and ideological alignment with the more left-leaning faction of the Democratic Party. This, according to Shapiro, will only serve to underscore Harris’ own radicalism and alienate more moderate voters.
Another key point raised by Shapiro is that Walz hails from a non-swing state, which he believes diminishes the strategic value of the selection. Swing states, often the battlegrounds that determine the outcome of presidential elections, are typically the focus of intense campaigning and resource allocation. By choosing a running mate from a state that is not considered a crucial battleground, Shapiro argues that Harris has missed an opportunity to bolster the Democratic ticket’s chances in a closely contested election.
Shapiro also suggests that Harris’ decision to pass over Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, who is Jewish, in favor of Walz was a calculated move to appease the “anti-Israel segment of the Democratic Party.” This, he believes, further underscores the party’s shift towards more progressive and divisive positions on issues related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Shapiro’s Celebration of Harris’ “Political Malpractice”
Despite his strong criticism of Harris’ VP selection, Ben Shapiro appears to be celebrating the decision, viewing it as a significant misstep that will ultimately benefit the Republican Party. In his assessment, Shapiro describes the pick as “political malpractice,” arguing that it demonstrates a lack of competence and strategic thinking on the part of the Democratic ticket.
Shapiro contends that Harris has been attempting to present herself as a moderate, “switching all of her positions” and sending out surrogates to downplay her more progressive stances. However, the selection of Walz, in Shapiro’s view, “has been proved it was all a lie” and that Harris is instead catering to her “radical base.”
Shapiro’s enthusiasm for Harris’ VP pick stems from his belief that it will provide a significant advantage to the Republican Party in the upcoming election. He argues that Walz’s radical reputation and the perception of Harris’ own extremism will resonate with voters and mobilize the GOP’s base, potentially swinging the balance of power in their favor.
Best thing about him and his state is the criminal George Floyd is still dead.