The investigation into the January 6 events has taken a dramatic turn with the release of a second report by the House Administration’s Subcommittee on Oversight, chaired by Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA). This report sheds light not only on intelligence and security failures but also exposes serious ethical violations involving former Representative Liz Cheney and her dealings with “star witness” Cassidy Hutchinson.
One of the most shocking revelations in the report is the recommendation for a criminal investigation into Liz Cheney for potential witness tampering. The evidence suggests Cheney colluded directly with Hutchinson while she was still represented by her attorney, Stefan Passantino. Cheney’s communications with Hutchinson, which bypassed her legal representation, raise significant ethical and legal concerns.
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1869061553288593860
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1869066458921316784
Hutchinson’s testimony played a crucial role in the J6 Committee’s narrative against President Trump, including controversial claims that Trump approved of chants calling for harm to then-Vice President Mike Pence. However, the new report points out that many of Hutchinson’s most sensational claims lacked evidence, and the Committee allegedly knew they were false. Despite this, Cheney and the Committee pushed these narratives forward to target Trump, undermining investigative integrity.
The Subcommittee’s findings also highlight troubling actions by the J6 Committee, including accusations that the Committee withheld or deleted critical evidence from its final report. This selective presentation of information not only distorted the truth but also weakened the credibility of the entire investigation. Loudermilk’s report contends that the J6 Committee was improperly formed and driven by a political agenda rather than a genuine pursuit of justice.
Additionally, the report calls attention to failures by multiple agencies, particularly the Department of Defense, which allegedly scapegoated the Washington D.C. National Guard to deflect blame from senior leadership. The breakdown in intelligence and security measures contributed to the chaos on January 6, yet these systemic failures were largely ignored by the J6 Committee’s final conclusions.
The controversy surrounding Cheney’s conduct extends beyond her interactions with Hutchinson. The report accuses Cheney of helping Hutchinson replace her attorney and encouraging her to provide new testimony that would support the Committee’s anti-Trump narrative. This level of interference has prompted calls for further investigation and disciplinary action against Cheney for violating ethical standards.
The findings of Loudermilk’s investigation raise serious questions about the legitimacy and fairness of the J6 Committee’s work. It paints a picture of a politically driven effort to damage President Trump, rather than an unbiased inquiry into the events of January 6. With these revelations, the credibility of the J6 Committee’s conclusions is now under serious scrutiny, and the calls for accountability are growing louder.
Leave a Comment